Ballot Math / School districts / Dysart Unified
School board race and measure: Dysart Unified School District
Dysart Unified: two seats, three candidates, and a $71.4 million bond
How this race works: two of the board's five seats are up, both for four-year terms. Three candidates are on the ballot; vote for up to two and the top two win. Board service is unpaid.
Dawn Densmore (incumbent)
Lisa Everett
- Stated priorities (her campaign site): early intervention programs for literacy and math proficiency, teacher retention, and keeping administrative costs low so more money reaches the classroom.
William Coniam
- Stated priorities: expanding career and technical education through West-MEC, supporting school resource officers, and ensuring taxpayer dollars reach the classroom instead of administration.
Proposition 421: a $71.4 million bond
In one sentence: Dysart Unified may borrow $71,400,000 to address identified facility needs, repaid through the secondary property tax at an estimated average annual rate of $0.17 per $100 of net assessed value.
The math for your household
About $52 a year for 15 years, on a $250,000 home
That is the Arizona Republic's figure for a homeowner whose home is valued at $250,000. The district's own average rate estimate, $0.17 per $100 of net assessed value, works out to about $42.50 a year on a home with $25,000 of net assessed value (roughly a $250,000 market value home at the 10 percent residential assessment ratio). The two figures differ because they come from different sources and assumptions; both are printed here with their sources.
A YES vote
The district may sell up to $71.4 million in bonds for facility upkeep and improvements, with the debt service in your secondary tax.
A NO vote
No new borrowing. Facility work is handled from the regular capital budget, deferred, or the district returns with a different ask.
The strongest case for YES
- Upkeep is not optional. Supporters argue the facilities needs are identified and ongoing, bonds are the only capital mechanism Arizona provides at this scale, and deferring maintenance raises its eventual cost.
- The rate is modest. At an estimated average of $0.17 per $100, this is one of the smaller bond rates on the county's 2026 school ballot.
The strongest case for NO
- Debt is still debt. Opponents note $71.4 million of principal carries interest on top, and that voters who doubt the board's spending discipline, in a race where every candidate talks about money reaching classrooms, may reasonably withhold new borrowing authority.
- No is a complete sentence. The district managed its capital budget before this ask and can return with a more specific project list if voters want one.
Verification notes
- School board campaigns file finance reports with Maricopa County. No raised or spent totals for these campaigns appeared in the coverage we reviewed; we print no totals rather than guess.
- No organized local campaign for or against Prop 421 was found in the sources reviewed; the cases above are stated in the terms each side uses in Arizona bond elections generally, with the district's figures attributed to the district.
- The censure account for Everett is from her former committee's website as reported by the Republic; it is an accusation by a party committee, printed here because it is part of her public record in this race, with its source stated.
How to vote without getting your ballot rejected
- Mail it by Tuesday, October 27, 2026. After that day, do not mail it: use a drop box or a vote center instead.
- It must be received by 7 p.m. on Election Day, Tuesday, November 3. Postmarks do not count.
- Sign and date the affidavit envelope, and write a current phone number on it.
- Leaving any item blank is allowed. The board race and the bond are separate items; answer either, both, or none.
Sources
- Certified candidates, Maricopa County School Superintendent: schoolsup.org (PDF)
- District announcement of Proposition 421: dysart.org
- Arizona Republic school board guide, October 2, 2026: azcentral.com