Ballot Math / City of Chandler
Ballot measures: City of Chandler
The Chandler section of your ballot
Proposition 430: Home Rule (the city spending limit)
Arizona's constitution caps how much a city may spend using a formula based on 1979-80 service levels, adjusted for population and inflation. Cities may ask voters, every four years, to approve a local alternative instead, after which the council sets the limit each year following a public hearing. Chandler voters have approved Home Rule every four years since 1982. This vote covers fiscal years 2028 through 2031.
About $257 million of spending room is the difference.
For fiscal 2028, Chandler estimates it could spend about $1,129,363,252 under Home Rule, versus about $871,887,658 under the state formula. The revenue is the same either way, about $1.13 billion. This measure creates no tax and raises no rate. It decides how much of the money the city already collects it is allowed to spend.
A YES vote
Continues the local limit through fiscal 2031. The council sets the spending ceiling annually after a public hearing.
A NO vote
The state formula applies. Chandler would collect roughly the same revenue but be barred from spending about $257 million of it in fiscal 2028, which in practice means service cuts, deferred projects, or money sitting unspent.
For: the state formula reflects the Chandler of 1980, a far smaller city, and the Chandler Chamber of Commerce supports renewal. Against: the standing argument is that the state cap is a discipline device, and local control means trusting the council with the larger number every four years without a fight.
Question 1: The APS franchise
Under Ordinance No. 5160, the franchise would run January 1, 2027 through December 31, 2051, and it is non-exclusive. APS pays the city a franchise fee of 2 percent of its revenue from customers inside Chandler, which goes to general city services. Crews need a legal right to dig, string, and repair lines in streets and easements; the franchise is that right, on the city's terms for construction, maintenance, liability, and insurance.
A YES vote
Grants the 25-year franchise on the ordinance's terms. The 2 percent fee continues funding general services.
A NO vote
APS is left without a current franchise agreement for work in Chandler rights-of-way, which the city and APS would then have to sort out. It does not switch your power company.
Proposition 431: When the vice-mayor is picked
A YES vote
Pins the selection to a specific, predictable meeting each year.
A NO vote
Keeps the current 31-day window language.
No arguments for or against were submitted to the official pamphlet. This is a housekeeping clarification, and it is fine to treat it as one.
Proposition 432: Resign to run for mayor
A YES vote
Aligns the city charter with Arizona's resign-to-run statute. A council member cannot hold their seat as a fallback while running for mayor.
A NO vote
Keeps the charter's current wording, which sits out of step with the state rule it mirrors.
No arguments for or against were submitted to the official pamphlet.
Proposition 433: One reading for ordinances instead of two
Today the charter requires two considerations, an introduction and a second meeting for final adoption, which builds in a pause of days or weeks between a proposal appearing and becoming law. Under 433, the ordinance is still published and still gets a noticed meeting where anyone may be heard, and if it is amended in substance it must go through the full process again before adoption.
A YES vote
Faster council action; one less procedural step for routine and urgent measures alike.
A NO vote
Keeps the built-in cooling-off period, the public's guaranteed second look between introduction and passage.
No arguments for or against were submitted to the official pamphlet. This is the one housekeeping item with a real tradeoff: government speed versus a structural pause that exists so residents can react before a vote becomes final.
Proposition 434: City leaders must live in Chandler
A YES vote
The people who run the city must live in it, within a year of taking the job.
A NO vote
No charter residency deadline for the city manager and council appointees.
No arguments for or against were submitted to the official pamphlet. The practical tradeoff, unstated in the pamphlet: residency rules are a statement about accountability and stake in the community, and they also narrow the recruiting pool for senior city jobs.
How to vote without getting your ballot rejected
- Mail it by Tuesday, October 27, 2026. After that day, do not mail it: use a drop box or a vote center.
- It must be received by 7 p.m. on Election Day, Tuesday, November 3, 2026. Postmarks do not count.
- Sign and date the affidavit envelope, and write a current phone number on it. If your signature is questioned, the county will use that number to reach you.
- Leaving any item blank is allowed. It does not affect the rest of your ballot.
Sources
- All six items, official text, figures, and pamphlet arguments: City of Chandler 2026 General Election Pamphlet and Sample Ballot, City Clerk Jennifer Ekblad: chandleraz.gov (PDF)
- Home Rule figures are the City's fiscal 2028 estimates as printed in the pamphlet (with Home Rule about $1,129,363,252; under the state formula about $871,887,658; revenue about $1.13 billion either way).
Ballot Math: analysis only, no endorsements. Housekeeping measures get the same honesty as big ones: if there is no real controversy, this page says so. Back to Ballot Math home.