LD11: a 2024 rematch in one of Arizona's safest Democratic districts
State Senate: Miranda vs. Ayala, again
Catherine Miranda (Democrat, incumbent)
Key votes (verified individually via Vote Smart and reported roll calls):
- HB 2133 (2026), age and consent verification for sexual material published online: NO (Senate conference report vote, June 9, 2026).
- HCR 2001 (2026), the referral that became Prop 144 (the FAST Election Results Act): NO, per the Freedom Index's Senate record for her. Prop 144 itself is covered on its own page.
- SB 1426 (2026), expediting removal of unlawful occupants: NO, the lone no vote in a 25 to 1 Senate passage, per State Affairs. Her stated reason, in that reporting: she understood the need to protect homeowners but cited homelessness and a lack of support from the state and the city of Phoenix. That is a dissent with a stated rationale, printed with both.
- HB 2859 (2024 session): YES, per a published Senate roll call on Open States.
Stated priorities, in her words via the Arizona Republic: she will be an advocate for "homelessness, the severely mentally ill, quality education, and job creation initiatives that benefit all Arizonans," alongside the education reform work she has pushed since 2011. Endorsements and scorecards, attributed: endorsed by Reproductive Freedom for All for 2026; Sierra Club Grand Canyon Chapter rating of 92 percent in the listing retrieved via Vote Smart; Freedom Index score of 15 percent in its listing.
Money: as of her March 2026 campaign finance reports, raised $18,750, spent $12,331.79, $36,671.11 on hand. That date is part of the fact: no later figure was retrieved.
Controversies: none of significance found for this cycle. Her lone no vote on SB 1426 drew attention precisely because it was lone; her explanation is printed above with the vote.
Joshua Ayala (Republican)
- Stated priorities (Arizona Republic): he argues he will fight to ensure Laveen, south Phoenix, and Guadalupe receive the same services as the rest of the Valley; his campaign highlights public safety and family values.
- Record: no prior elective record in the sources retrieved. Money: no campaign finance totals located; he appears on Clean Elections funded candidate lists retrieved for this cycle. Controversies: none found.
State House: two incumbents, two challengers, a 50 point district
Oscar De Los Santos (Democrat, incumbent)
Key votes (verified individually via Vote Smart):
- HB 2677 (2024), repeal of the 1864 near total abortion ban: YES, and a sponsor of the bill.
- HB 2133 (2026), online age and consent verification: NO (conference report). HCR 2056 (2026), constitutional right to refuse medical mandates: NO. HCR 2001 (2026), the referral behind Prop 144: NO. HB 2223 (2026), disclosure when a registered sex offender requests a legal name change: YES.
- HCR 2016 (2026), precinct based voting referral: DID NOT VOTE, printed here as a non vote, not a position.
- SB 1106 (2026), aligning state tax rates with the federal "One Big Beautiful Bill" rates: NO. HB 2704 (2025), tax distribution for a new Diamondbacks stadium: NO.
Stated priorities and support, attributed: affordable college tuition and protections for workers, per his campaign and the Arizona Republic; endorsed by the Arizona Education Association, the LGBTQ+ Victory Fund, the Sierra Club Grand Canyon Chapter, and several local labor unions in the listings retrieved. Scorecard, attributed: Freedom Index 2025 to 2026 House score of 36 in its listing; Institute for Legislative Analysis score of 6 percent for 2023.
Money: no clean cycle total for him was retrievable without mixing cycles, so none is printed. Controversies: none of significance found; as minority leader he is the House Democrats' chief public critic of the Republican majority, which is the job, reported as such.
Junelle Cavero (Democrat, incumbent)
- Stated priorities (Arizona Republic): job growth in the semiconductor industry and artificial intelligence, while protecting the state's natural resources.
- Key votes: no individually verified key votes for Cavero were retrieved from Vote Smart in this research pass, and none are assumed here. That is a research gap, stated openly; her tenure also began partway through the 2024 session, which shortens the record either way. See verification notes.
- Money: no campaign finance totals located. Controversies: none found.
Cesar Aleman (Republican)
- Stated priorities (Arizona Republic): running to "protect families as the foundation of strong neighborhoods" in Laveen and south Phoenix.
- Record: no prior elective record in the sources retrieved. Money: no totals located; he appears on Clean Elections funded candidate lists retrieved for this cycle. Controversies: none found.
Joseph Dailey (Republican)
- Stated priorities (Arizona Republic): supporting the state's infrastructure and education system; he says his leadership experience has prepared him for public office.
- Record: no prior elective record in the sources retrieved. Money: no totals located; he appears on Clean Elections funded candidate lists retrieved for this cycle. Controversies: none found.
Verification notes
- Key vote depth is this page's known shortfall on one side. De Los Santos has seven individually verified votes via Vote Smart and Miranda has four via Vote Smart, the Freedom Index, State Affairs, and Open States. No name level key votes were retrieved for Cavero, Ayala, Aleman, or Dailey (the latter three have no legislative record to check), and no party line votes were added without a name level source.
- Money is thin across this page. Only Miranda has a dated figure (March 2026). No clean cycle totals were located for De Los Santos, Cavero, Ayala, Aleman, or Dailey; several of the challengers and Ayala appear on Clean Elections funded lists, which is consistent with small public financing campaigns rather than large donor operations.
- Competitiveness language: "effectively decided" in the raceboxes is this site's characterization of the registration and 2024 margins, not a forecaster's rating. No forecaster rating for these specific races was found.
How to vote without getting your ballot rejected
- Mail it by Tuesday, October 27, 2026. After that day, do not mail it: use a drop box or a vote center instead.
- It must be received by 7 p.m. on Election Day, Tuesday, November 3. Postmarks do not count.
- Sign and date the affidavit envelope, and write a current phone number on it.
- For write-ins: only votes for officially filed write-in candidates are counted. Write the name exactly and fill the oval. No official write-in for these two LD11 races was verified for the general election in our research.
- Leaving any item blank is allowed. It does not affect the rest of your ballot.
Sources
- District profile and registration: 2026 Arizona General Election Guide (PDF); Arizona Republic legislature guide, September 29, 2026
- Fields, primaries, and March 2026 money: Wikipedia, 2026 Arizona Senate election
- Miranda: Wikipedia, Catherine Miranda; Vote Smart profile and key votes; Freedom Index, Catherine Miranda
- De Los Santos: Wikipedia, Oscar De Los Santos; Vote Smart profile and key votes
- Cavero: Wikipedia, Junelle Cavero
- Endorsement: Reproductive Freedom for All, October 2, 2026 endorsements